Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14: A Comprehensive Comparison

When it comes to running shoes, Brooks has earned a stellar reputation among athletes and casual runners alike. Two of the brand’s most beloved models are the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Ghost 14. Both shoes offer top-notch comfort and support, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. If you’re torn between these two options, this detailed comparison will help you decide which one is the best fit for you.

In this blog post, we’ll break down the differences and similarities between the Brooks Glycerin 19 and the Ghost 14, focusing on key factors such as cushioning, support, durability, weight, breathability, and overall performance. By the end of this comparison, you’ll have a clear understanding of which shoe meets your running requirements. Let’s dive into the details.

Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14

Brooks has long been known for producing high-quality, reliable running shoes. The Glycerin 19 and Ghost 14 are two of their flagship models, each designed to cater to specific types of runners. While both shoes are popular for their plush cushioning and neutral support, they have distinct features that make them unique. In this post, we’ll explore how these shoes differ and which one may be better suited to your running style and needs.

The Brooks Glycerin 19 is part of Brooks’ highly cushioned lineup, designed for runners who prioritize a soft, luxurious feel underfoot. It’s ideal for long-distance runners or those who need extra protection against impact. On the other hand, the Ghost 14 is a versatile shoe that’s slightly lighter, offering a balanced blend of comfort and responsiveness. It’s often favored by runners who enjoy daily training or shorter distances.

Now that we have a basic overview, let’s move into the detailed comparison of the Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14.

Cushioning and Comfort

One of the first things runners look for in a shoe is the level of cushioning and overall comfort. When comparing the Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14, the difference in cushioning is notable.

• Brooks Glycerin 19: Known for its plush cushioning, the Glycerin 19 uses DNA LOFT, Brooks’ softest midsole technology. The shoe provides a cloud-like experience, making it a great choice for long-distance runners who need that extra softness underfoot. The cushioning extends throughout the midsole, ensuring a smooth ride from heel to toe.
• Ghost 14: While also cushioned with DNA LOFT, the Ghost 14 offers a slightly firmer feel compared to the Glycerin 19. It strikes a balance between softness and responsiveness, which is ideal for runners who want comfort without feeling too disconnected from the ground. The cushioning in the Ghost 14 is less plush but still provides excellent protection for daily runs.

Verdict: If maximum cushioning and a luxurious feel are your top priorities, the Glycerin 19 may be the better option. However, if you prefer a more balanced and responsive ride, the Ghost 14 could be the right choice for you.

Support and Stability

Both the Brooks Glycerin 19 and Ghost 14 are neutral running shoes, which means they are designed for runners with a neutral gait. However, the way they provide support and stability differs slightly.

• Brooks Glycerin 19: The Glycerin 19 offers excellent support through its plush cushioning and secure upper. The internal stretch bootie hugs the foot for a snug fit, which helps reduce unnecessary movement inside the shoe. This support is perfect for runners who need a bit more stability due to the softness of the midsole.
• Ghost 14: The Ghost 14 provides solid support without feeling too restrictive. Its engineered mesh upper allows for flexibility, while still holding the foot in place. The shoe’s segmented crash pad ensures smooth transitions, making it a great option for runners who want a shoe that adapts well to their stride.

Verdict: If you need more cushioning-based support, the Glycerin 19 is the way to go. However, for runners who prefer a more flexible and adaptive fit, the Ghost 14 may be more comfortable.

Durability and Longevity

Durability is a key factor when investing in a pair of running shoes. You want a shoe that can withstand miles of running without wearing down too quickly. Both the Brooks Glycerin 19 and Ghost 14 are built to last, but there are some differences in their construction that impact their durability.

• Brooks Glycerin 19: The Glycerin 19 is built for long-distance runs and high mileage. Its durable rubber outsole and reinforced upper ensure that the shoe holds up well over time. The extra cushioning also helps protect against wear and tear, making it a great choice for runners who log a lot of miles.
• Ghost 14: The Ghost 14 is also a durable shoe, though its lighter construction means it may not last as long as the Glycerin 19 if you’re running high mileage regularly. However, for daily training and shorter runs, the Ghost 14 offers plenty of durability, thanks to its robust rubber outsole and quality materials.

Verdict: If you’re a high-mileage runner looking for a shoe that can go the distance, the Glycerin 19 might be the better option. However, for everyday runners who value lightweight durability, the Ghost 14 is still an excellent choice.

Weight and Responsiveness

For many runners, the weight of a shoe can make a big difference in performance. A lighter shoe can feel more responsive and faster, while a heavier shoe might offer more comfort and cushioning.

• Brooks Glycerin 19: Weighing around 10.2 ounces (men’s size), the Glycerin 19 is not the lightest shoe on the market, but the weight is a result of its plush cushioning. While it’s heavier than the Ghost 14, the added softness makes it ideal for long runs where comfort is more important than speed.
• Ghost 14: At 9.2 ounces (men’s size), the Ghost 14 is noticeably lighter than the Glycerin 19. This lighter weight makes the Ghost 14 feel more responsive, especially during shorter runs or speedwork. Runners who prefer a faster, more agile shoe will likely appreciate the Ghost 14’s lightweight design.

Verdict: If you value lightweight performance and responsiveness, the Ghost 14 may be the better option. However, if you’re willing to sacrifice a bit of weight for added comfort, the Glycerin 19 is a solid choice.

Breathability and Upper Design

The breathability of a shoe’s upper can make a significant difference in overall comfort, especially during long runs or in warm weather. Let’s look at how the Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14 compare in terms of breathability.

• Brooks Glycerin 19: The Glycerin 19 features an engineered mesh upper that provides a good balance between breathability and support. The upper conforms well to the shape of the foot, offering both ventilation and a secure fit. However, because the shoe is built for plush comfort, it might feel slightly warmer than the Ghost 14 in hotter conditions.
• Ghost 14: The Ghost 14 also uses an engineered mesh upper, but it’s designed to be more lightweight and breathable. The mesh allows for better airflow, making the Ghost 14 a cooler shoe for warm-weather runs. The flexible upper adapts well to different foot shapes, providing a comfortable fit without sacrificing ventilation.

Verdict: If breathability is a top concern, the Ghost 14’s lighter, more ventilated upper may be the better choice. The Glycerin 19 still offers decent breathability but prioritizes comfort over ventilation.

Outsole and Traction

Traction is an important factor, especially for runners who run on various surfaces or in different weather conditions. Let’s examine the outsoles of the Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14.

• Brooks Glycerin 19: The Glycerin 19’s outsole is made from durable blown rubber, designed to provide excellent grip on roads and paved surfaces. The shoe performs well in both dry and slightly wet conditions, though it’s not ideal for trail running or extreme weather conditions.
• Ghost 14: The Ghost 14 also features a blown rubber outsole, but it’s slightly more versatile. It provides reliable traction on roads, tracks, and even light trails. The segmented crash pad in the outsole ensures smooth transitions and added stability, which is especially helpful for runners who tackle various terrains.

Verdict: For runners who need a shoe with more versatile traction, the Ghost 14 offers a slight edge. The Glycerin 19 is still a great choice for road runners but may not be as adaptable to different surfaces as the Ghost 14.

Price and Value for Money

The price of running shoes can vary greatly, and it’s essential to find a shoe that offers good value for your investment. Let’s look at the pricing of the Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14.

• Brooks Glycerin 19: The Glycerin 19 is positioned as a premium running shoe, with a higher price tag due to its plush cushioning and luxurious feel. While it may cost more upfront, its durability and comfort make it a worthwhile investment for runners who prioritize cushioning.
• Ghost 14: The Ghost 14 is priced slightly lower than the Glycerin 19, making it a more budget-friendly option. Despite its lower price, the Ghost 14 still offers excellent performance and comfort, making it a great value for runners who want a reliable, everyday training shoe.

Verdict: If you’re willing to invest in premium cushioning and comfort, the Glycerin 19 is worth the higher price. However, for runners looking for a more affordable, versatile shoe, the Ghost 14 provides excellent value for money.

Conclusion: Which Shoe is Right for You?

In the battle between the Brooks Glycerin 19 vs Ghost 14, the choice ultimately comes down to your running preferences and needs. Both shoes offer exceptional comfort, support, and durability, but they cater to different types of runners.

• Choose the Brooks Glycerin 19 if you prioritize plush cushioning and comfort, especially for long-distance running. Its soft underfoot feel and secure fit make it an excellent choice for runners who need extra protection against impact.
• Opt for the Ghost 14 if you prefer a more balanced and responsive shoe for daily training. Its lightweight design, breathability, and versatile traction make it a fantastic option for a variety of runs, from short sprints to longer sessions.

Both shoes are excellent in their own right, and you can’t go wrong with either option. Your decision will depend on what you value most in a running shoe.

Now it’s your turn! Have you tried either the Brooks Glycerin 19 or Ghost 14? Which one do you prefer, and why? Leave a comment below and share your thoughts with fellow runners!